[TEST(/review)] major/minor/devname fix

[Andrey Chernov]

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:32:39AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> There is no risk of collision, look at what devfs_random() does.

What happens with whole devfs_random() logic, in case first devfs_seed 
obtained after masking with 0xf0f becomes 0 again (as it was before)? And 
second? And third? It may happens especially in some "no good entropy yet" 
scenario.

-- 
http://ache.pp.ru/