groff alternative?

[Emanuel Strobl]

Am Montag, 2. Mai 2005 23:44 schrieb Lyndon Nerenberg:
> --On 2005-4-30 6:00 AM +1000 Peter Jeremy
>
> <PeterJeremy at optushome.com.au> wrote:
> > I don't believe the nroff in either 4.3BSD or 2.11BSD can support long
> > names and neither include a mdoc(7) implementation.  4.4BSD includes
> > mdoc(7) but also GNU groff - though a quick look at the tmac.mdoc*
> > files suggests that it might work with an old (4.3 or 2.11) nroff.
>
> When the Solaris 10 source is released there will be an up-to-date
> alternative to groff. I'm planning to switch over to the Solaris troff
> ASAP. I've already started fixing mdoc to work with ditroff on another
> Solaris 10 box.

Dear Lyndon,

today I read a news article (http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/60600) 
about OpenSolaris beeing released, but is there also the groff alternative 
included?
I'd love to see a lean replacment for our current gnu version.

Thnaks,

-Harry

>
> --lyndon
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20050614/34324395/attachment.bin