CALL FOR TESTERS: geom_vol_cd9660 class

[Pawel Jakub Dawidek]

On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:06:58PM +0200, Dario Freni wrote:
+> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
+> > What's wrong with glabel(8)?
+> 
+> Honestly, I didn't know it before. Looking into NanoBSD code I saw it
+> use GEOM_VOL, so I started investigate on geom_vol_ffs and write this
+> tiny class. Agreeing with Andreas Kohn on current@:
+> 
+> <quote>
+> But, the really important question is: why is there geom_vol_ffs and
+> geom_label? Apparently I wasn't the only one who did not see
+> geom_label  :)
+> </quote>

That's actually my fault. I wanted to remove geom_vol_ffs long time
ago to not confuse the users.

To not make your work useless, could you verify iso9660 part of
geom_label? Maybe I missed something there.

-- 
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheel.pl
pjd at FreeBSD.org                           http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20050726/0fde077b/attachment.bin