Atheros and SIS bridging problem
Sam Leffler
sam at errno.com
Thu Jan 13 14:47:16 PST 2005
Ben Becker wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:50:03 +0800, Clive Lin <clive at tongi.org> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 09:23:08AM -0800, Ben Becker wrote:
>>
>>>[Laptop]--------(sis0)-[FreeBSD Bridge]-(ath0)--------[FreeBSD AP]
>>>
>>>There seems to be a problem with bridging ath0 and sis0. I have 1 IP
>>>assigned to ath0 which is 192.168.1.3, and I've sysctl'd
>>>'net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1' and
>>>'net.link.ether.bridge.config=ath0,sis0'. From the bridge, I can ping
>>>the AP (192.168.1.1) and the laptop (192.168.1.5). However I can't
>>>ping from the laptop to the AP or from the AP to the laptop.
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>> Have you tried ng_bridge(4)? My own experience is similar with
>>yours, and the problem like yours is sovled via ng_bridge(4). Example
>>scripts to setup ng_bridge(4) is at
>>/usr/share/examples/netgraph/ether.bridge.
>>
>
>
> Thank you for the idea, but there are still problems that appear to be
> related to net80211 or the ath driver. I did get a little further in
> debugging this with ng_bridge, though. Packets from the remote
> computer actually go through the bridge and get to the AP. I enabled
> debug mode for ath0 on the AP(ifconfig ath0 debug), and here's what I
> get when I try to send a packet from a remote computer that goes
> through the bridge (hand transcribed):
>
> ath0: station 00:0c:6e:a7:47:3b deauthenticate (reason 6)
> ath0: sending deauth to 00:0c:6e:a7:47:3b on channel 11
> ath0: station 00:0c:6e:a7:47:3b disassociate (reason 7)
> ath0: sending disassoc to 00:0c:6e:a7:47:3b on channel 11
> ath0: received auth from 00:0b:6b:33:08:1a rssi 22
> ath0: sending auth to 00:0b:6b:33:08:1a on channel 11
> ath0: station already 00:0b:6b:33:08:1a authenticated
> ath0: received assoc_req from 00:0b:6b:33:08:1a rssi 24
> ath0: sending assoc_resp to 00:0b:6b:33:08:1a on channel 11
> ath0: station already 00:0b:6b:33:08:1a associated
>
> 00:0c:6e:a7:47:3b is the MAC address of the remote computer's rl0 interface.
> 00:0b:6b:33:08:1a is the MAC address of the bridge's ath0 interface.
>
> It appears as though ath0 on the AP sees the packet, but thinks the
> remote computer is actually a station that isn't associated. Am I
> correct here? I'm not very familiar with the net80211 code, but would
> it be possible to simply allow the AP to receive and transmit packets
> to/from layer 2 address that aren't necessarily associated?
>
> I know Sam recommended tunneling, but I'd like to essentially have a
> system that works like those Ethernet-to-Wireless bridge devices (i.e.
> D-Link DWL-810, newer Linksys WAP11). Am I dreaming -- is this even
> possible? The more I look into it there doesn't seem to be any
> standard way of creating an 'Ethernet-to-Wireless' bridge. I'd like
> to hear from the net80211 pros what the best (if any) solution would
> be for 'Ethernet-to-Wireless' bridging.
Those devices tunnel using a 4-address 802.11 format specifically
designed for this. Like I said, what you need is not currently
supported. The encapsulation work is actually very simple; the hard bit
is how everything ties into the system. I happen to be working on this
but results will not be available for a while.
Sam
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list