Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3
Richard Coleman
rcoleman at criticalmagic.com
Thu Jan 6 08:28:30 PST 2005
Robert Ryan wrote:
> Fellow FreeBSD developers,
>
> I hate to say I told you but it was inevitable.
>
> Check this out: http://www.feyrer.de/NetBSD/gmcgarry/
Well, even though this link was submitted by a troll, the benchmarks are
actually pretty interesting and worth reading. Just keep the following
in mind:
1. Although NetBSD did perform better on many of the benchmarks (kudos
to them), but the difference is usually not dramatic.
2. The benchmarks are strictly uniprocessor benchmarks.
3. The author does admit at the end of the article that NetBSD still
uses a big, giant lock around the kernel and the benchmarks might be
very different on a multiprocessor system.
4. The benchmarks are only NetBSD versus FreeBSD, so it's hard to judge
where the performance of each system fits in the grand scheme of things.
It could be that both systems are performing very well. The
benchmarks need to include at least one non-BSD system (usually Linux)
in order to get some perspective.
5. It would have been nice if FreeBSD 4.10 and NetBSD 1.6.2 were also
include, so we could see the relative progress (or lack) of each system.
But it's worth reading. Data is always a good thing. Just don't get
hung up on them. Hopefully, it will inspire more comprehensive tests.
Richard Coleman
rcoleman at criticalmagic.com
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list