New malloc ready, take 42

[David Xu]

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> 
>>The '>' option should be supported in jemalloc because mysql relies
>>on it.
> 
> 
> That is indeed a strange usage of the word "relies" and it sort of
> indicates that you don't even have the foggiest notion about what
> the '>' option does in phkmalloc.
> 
> Maybe a reading of the relevant manual page might be in order ?
> 
> Poul-Henning
> 

I know what '>' does in phkmalloc. I found 'Q', he replaced '>' with
'Q', this is really strange to me. ;-)