pidfile_check() possible function
Pawel Jakub Dawidek
pjd at FreeBSD.org
Tue Dec 20 06:10:46 PST 2005
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:53:42PM +0300, Michael Bushkov wrote:
+> I've just had a situation, where I want to know the pid of the already running daemon, but i don't want to create the pidfile in case if there is no daemon running. Such a
+> situation can occur if the daemon has some kind of controlling program. This program should be able to know the pid of the daemon (to send a signal, or for some logging
+> With current pidfile API I don't see an appropriate way to do it. Pidfile_open() call can provide us with the PID. But if there is no daemon, this call will create the
+> pidfile - and we'll have to use pidfile_remove() to do the cleanup. This behaviour doesn't seem to be appropriate.
+> Is it possible to introduce some function to return the pid of the already running daemon or (-1), for example, if no daemon exists. Possible syntax can be:
+> int pidfile_check(pid_t *pidptr);
+> What do you think about that?
Maybe... This function is not enough for sure, as you need to provide
file to look for pid at least.
Take a look at takepid() function in usr.bin/pkill/pkill.c to see how
pkill(1) is doing this.
Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl
pjd at FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20051220/42673c06/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-current