[PATCH] nForce2 SMBus support

Artemiev Igor ai at bmc.brk.ru
Fri Dec 9 03:36:50 PST 2005

On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:51:51 -0500
John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > I simply do not see any way to do it with current implementation of
> > ampdm(and also viapm, etc) & smbus, without modifying the smb-
> > >smbus->smbus driver interface. I may be wrong, but as far as I
> > >know, currently it's one
> > smb for one driver (smbus_* limitation)
> Hmm, it doesn't specify the child device, just the parent.  *sigh*
> That's lame.  You don't have to call it amdpmsub0 btw, you could just
> call it amdpm1 if you wanted and have amdpm1 a child of amdpm0.  All
> that would need to change for that is the NF2_SUBDEV string and the
> DRIVER_MODULE line (it would be DRIVER_MODULE(amdpm, amdpm, ...)).
> This has the added advantage that you don't have to patch smbus.c.
I remade it as you described - can't understand, why I didn't think
about it myself

iprefetch ai

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list