Unable to build libedit
oberman at es.net
Thu Aug 18 16:50:54 GMT 2005
> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:34:39 +0200
> From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan at fafoe.narf.at>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:39:54PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > > Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:08:03 -0600
> > > From: Phil Oleson <oz at nixil.net>
> > >
> > > Do you have rev 1.10 of histedit.h? Update this file in src/include as well.
> > >
> > Thanks!
> > This is clearly the file I was looking for, but I have:
> > /usr/include/histedit.h
> > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/histedit.h
> > /usr/src/bin/sh/myhistedit.h
> > /usr/src/include/histedit.h
> > All except /usr/include/histedit.h are 1.10. The make buildworld SHOULD
> > be using the one in /usr/src/include, as far as I know. Looks to me like
> > it's failing to find it and using the one in /usr/include instead. Or is
> > my limited understanding of the build process in error?
> > And I can't explain where the one in /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include
> > comes from.
> Strange. Did you test if it works without ccache? As I understand it
> the headers from src/include are temporarily installed to
> /usr/obj/[...]/tmp and then used by GCC to build the world.
Yes, I tried both with and without ccache. No difference.
histedit.h has been at 1.9 for over two years and the Makefiles and .mk
files have had a LOT of tweaking since then. This system is a new
install that started with -current on about August 1. It should be
Of course, I could just copy 1.10 into /usr/include/sys, but I really
want to figure out why this is happening. I see myself spending too much
time in a maze of twisty .mk files, all different. :-)
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman at es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
More information about the freebsd-current