nullfs fixed ? (was: More into /etc/rc.d/jail)

Emanuel Strobl Emanuel.strobl at gmx.net
Tue Aug 9 22:03:43 GMT 2005


Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2005 00:00 CEST schrieb Emanuel Strobl:
> Am Dienstag, 9. August 2005 23:47 CEST schrieb Jeremie Le Hen:
> > Hi Emmanuel,
> >
> > > And you don't suffer from a big disk performance degradation with
> > > that? If you don't have I/O load it doesn't matter but I need usual
> > > I/O performance so I give each jail its own partition (GPT
> > > partitions). But I think some good guys are looking for fixing the
> > > performance issue like they already solved the nullfs problem :)
> > > Thanks again for that! (Jeff?)
> >
> > Are you sure that nullfs has been fixed ?  In this case, the warning
> > at the end of mount_nullfs(8) manpage should be removed.
>
> I haven't done my own benchmarks yet, but I'm quiet sure that was fixed
> about two or three months ago in 6.0-current. At that time I was
> figuring out how to avoid nullfs, but decided to keep using it, so I was
> conviced that it's been solved ;)

Here's what google found: 
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2005-April/048235.html

-Harry

> But I think Jeff can tell you more, if I don't mix up names again....
>
> -Harry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20050810/60ef3b03/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list