ule+preempt?

[Kris Kennaway]

On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:00:17PM -0400, Anish Mistry wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2005 09:40 pm, David Leimbach wrote:
> > On 4/26/05, Anish Mistry <mistry.7 at osu.edu> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 26 April 2005 10:15 am, Randy Bush wrote:
> > > > having been seriously burned, i have avoided ule for some
> > > > months. i am wondering if the waters have become relatively
> > > > safe to go to ule with preemption?
> > >
> > > I've been running it for few weeks and it seems to be fine for
> > > now, but YMMV.
> >
> > Are you on an SMP box?  I have a feeling it's pretty good on a UP
> > machine
> >
> I'm on on UP.  Running on SMP will probably reveal the squishy 
> underbelly to which Kris was referring.

I'd expect the same problems to appear less frequently on UP, but with
a non-zero probability.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20050426/7ea51287/attachment.bin