mgadrm fail in -CURRENT
Eric Anholt
eta at lclark.edu
Sun Apr 24 11:19:58 PDT 2005
On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 18:07 +0200, None wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 06:43:00PM +0400, Nguyen Tam Chinh wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Eric Anholt wrote:
> >
> > >On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 01:01 +0400, Nguyen Tam Chinh wrote:
> > >>Hello All,
> > >>I've just compiled -CURRENT (cvsup some hours ago) and the magdrm seemed
> > >>to be fail.
> > >>Last week's -CURRENT build was okay.
> > >
> > >Do you have device drm in your kernel?
> > >Did you do a clean build?
> > >
> >
> > Aha, I checked the config/NOTES and noticed that the new line: device drm
> > Thank you :)
> >
> > >There's no real reason to be building the drm into the kernel that I can
> > >see, as it's automatically loaded for you by the X Server.
>
> i might be off here, and dont intend to cause any offtopicness, altho i
> was informed perhaphs wrongly, that kernel-builtin drivers are having
> some speed improvements compared to loaded modules?
I've never seen any measurements showing that that's the case, and would
highly doubt there being any measurable effect.
--
Eric Anholt eta at lclark.edu
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt at FreeBSD.org
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list