unionfs 5.4

[Emanuel Strobl]

Am Donnerstag, 17. März 2005 02:24 schrieb Jeff Roberson:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 16. März 2005 07:16 schrieb Sergey Matveychuk:
> > > Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > > >>just ffs: 1:47 min
> > > >>nullfs:   1:43 min (oops!:)
> > > >>nullfs in jail: 12:12 min
> > > >>
> > > >>Almost ten times degradation.
> > > >
> > > > Can you try this again on current?  I just committed some changes to
> > > > nullfs which vastly simplify the locking.  I don't see anything
> > > > inherent in the code that should cause such a slowdown.
> > >
> > > The problem has gone. Thanks Jeff!
> > > Don't forget MFC it some time :)
> >
> > Highly appreciated for 5.4!!!
>
> I can't MFC this for 5.4, it requires too much of the new vfs architecture
> to properly function.  I'll mail re@ to see what their opinion is for 5.5.

I hope you don't mind if I ask about the chance to get your great work MFCd to 
RELENG_5 in the very near future, now that RELENG_5_4 is branched.

Thanks,

-Harry


>
> > Thanks a lot,
> >
> > -Harry
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20050404/8a00d113/attachment.bin