panic: sorele

[John Baldwin]

On Tuesday 28 September 2004 06:57 am, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday 27 September 2004 09:34 pm, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
> >>Robert Watson wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
> >>>>Does anybody know what is panic: sorele? :)
> >>>
> >>>It's the result of an inconsistency detected by the kernel regarding
> >>>kernel invariants for sockets.  The somewhat uninformative nature of the
> >>>message is historical, and should probably be fixed.  If this is
> >>>reproduceable, could you rebuild your kernel with INVARIANTS support, as
> >>>well as DDB so you can generate a stack trace and other debugging
> >>>information (or, if you have a core, could you use gdb to extract
> >>>debugging information per the Handbook?)
> >>
> >>I am not able to compile the kernel with DDB and INVARIANTS either...
> >>When I put these options to kernel conf, I get this error
> >>
> >>Options Added:
> >>
> >>options         INVARIANTS
> >>options         KDB
> >>options         DDB
> >
> > INVARIANTS requires the option 'INVARIANT_SUPPORT'.
>
> Good point, one sometimes wonders why options INVARIANTS doesnt
> automatically include options INVARIANT_SUPPORT :)

So you can build a kernel with INVARIANT_SUPPORT but no INVARIANTS but still 
build modules with INVARIANTS.  Useful when working on a device driver for 
example.  I think the dependency there is noted in sys/conf/NOTES btw.

-- 
John Baldwin <jhb at FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve"  =  http://www.FreeBSD.org