HEADS UP: BIND 9 imported, and working!
Toxa
postfix at sendmail.ru
Fri Sep 24 21:53:14 PDT 2004
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 05:07:38AM +0100, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> There are many differences between BIND 8 and 9. Some of the more
> important ones are how picky BIND 9 is about zone file format. Some
> zones that loaded fine under BIND 8 will not load with 9. The named
For example, new bind9 do not understand such kind of records:
use.exit.to.quit.nslookup.-.- A 192.168.2.2
quit IN CNAME use.exit.to.quit.nslookup.-.-
Sep 24 22:20:56 ns named[52308]: toxa.lan:22:
use.exit.to.quit.nslookup.-.-.toxa.lan: bad owner name (check-names)
Sep 24 22:20:56 ns /kernel: Sep 24 22:20:56 ns named[52308]:
toxa.lan:22: use.exit.to.quit.nslookup.-.-.toxa.lan: bad owner name
(check-names)
Sep 24 22:20:56 ns named[52308]: zone toxa.lan/IN: loading master file
toxa.lan: bad owner name (check-names)
Sep 24 22:20:56 ns /kernel: Sep 24 22:20:56 ns named[52308]: zone
toxa.lan/IN: loading master file toxa.lan: bad owner name (check-names)
Removing "-" works ok:
use.exit.to.quit.nslookup A 192.168.2.2
quit IN CNAME use.exit.to.quit.nslookup
Old bind was not so strict about it :-)
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list