atacontrol and creating raid-1 arrays
sos at DeepCore.dk
Tue Sep 14 02:39:41 PDT 2004
Eirik Oeverby wrote:
>> Since the RAID metadata has to be put on disk it wont work if you have
>> that area used for real data. Depending on what controller you use the
>> metadata can be stored in different places. Other than that it works
>> if you are *sure* the disks are identical (dd with a decnet blocksize
>> is *much* faster tha cp).
> Yea, I used dd (blocksize 256kbyte proved optimal; ~40mbyte/sec) for my
> final operation; was testing with cp first to make sure. This is a
> Silicon Image SATA RAID controller which isn't supported by the ATA
> driver in RAID mode, so it's purely software. Which, according to
> another reply I got, uses the last 255 sectors on the disk. These were
> already free, so I just tested - seems to work fine. Fsck has no
> complaints. Other things I should do to verify?
The Silicon Image SATA "RAID" controller is supported by ATA, and it has
*NO* RAID capabilities whatsoever, its all done in software, I just dont
support the particular metadata format that your BIOS uses.
Now that said metadata can take anywhere from 1 to 17 sectors either in
the front (old HPT) or the end (Promise/LSI/native) of the disk.
Anyhow if ataraid picks it up etc you should be fine :)
More information about the freebsd-current