EHCI considered harmful?

Michael Nottebrock michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Fri Oct 29 11:46:49 PDT 2004


On Friday, 29. October 2004 20:29, Mike Tancsa wrote:

> I think EHCI would only make it worse. 

Yes.

> The same 1.1 bugs would be there 
> that you mention, and then the ones added by EHCI.  i.e. it doesnt take any
> 1.1 bugs away, just adds more.

Exactly. And I still say it should go in. And you should file a PR about your 
ehci issues (oh, yeah, and we need USB maintainers to take them, too :().

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20041029/07ab6b8f/attachment-0001.bin


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list