Portupgrade -af question

[David O'Brien]

On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 12:34:51PM -0700, Zoltan Frombach wrote:
> >Yes. Wouldn't it be a nice feature for "portupgrade -P" to install the
> >port instead of the package if any non-defaults were defined in
> >pkgtools.conf?
> 
> If you really want to add this to portupgrade, it should be optional, 
> though. Because someone might have a broken compiler or something and just 
> wants to install a binary package quickly. In that case it should be 
> possible to force a binary package installation regardless of what's inside 
> the pkgtools.conf file. Don't you agree? 

'portupgrade -PP' can still be used for that.

-- 
-- David  (obrien at FreeBSD.org)