Read-only ReiserFS support for FreeBSD 5.x

[Ryan Sommers]

Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:

> Thank you ! About performance, this current port is slower than the
> original Linux code, because it adds a few malloc() that could be
> avoided I guess. The problem is I don't know how to use the locking 
> systems.

I'm guessing this port doesn't make any use of the zone allocator? If 
not, significant performance could likely be gained by using it as 
opposed to simply kmalloc(9).

-- 
Ryan Sommers
ryans at gamersimpact.com