Crash with new bind/host cmds on -CURRENT (poss. runq_remove?)

[Chris Hedley]

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 02:41:04AM +0100, Chris Hedley wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Ryan Sommers wrote:
>>> Are you using PREEMPT with SHED_ULE? Or is this just SHED_ULE without
>>> preemption?
>>
>> I have both SCHED_ULE and PREEMPTION set in my config file, which I've
>> included as an attachment "just in case" (please don't laugh at how
>> scruffy it's become!)
>
> Aargh..you'd think people would have got the idea by now that
> SCHED_ULE is broken, especially with PREEMPTION!

I'm afraid that one also escaped my attention (I should really try to keep 
up with the list if I insist on using -CURRENT, I suppose!)  I'd managed 
to get the impression that SCHED_ULE was the "way ahead", and I suppose I 
may as well keep it in there unless it becomes a major problem, but I can 
live without PREEMPTION so I'll lose that.

I'll give it another recompile without PREEMPTION (and, if that doesn't 
fix it, with SCHED_4BSD instead of _ULE) and report my findings.  But I'll 
do that tomorrow as it's now 4:30am and I'm feeling a bit bleary-eyed...

Chris.