mbuf leak with SMP and debug.mpsafenet=1
Andrew Gallatin
gallatin at cs.duke.edu
Tue Oct 19 15:08:13 PDT 2004
Robert Watson writes:
>
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> > I hooked up the em0 GbE interfaces, and that leaks nearly as bad as my
> > myrinet nic (at least with a linux sender, hooked back-to-back). Em0
> > seems to be leaking at a few thoundsand pkts/sec, so I wasn't brave
> > enough to do a long run..
>
> Oh, I just had a thought. Could you try this patch (perhaps with tweaks
> to apply to recent kernels):
>
> http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/netperf/20040910-atomic-mballoc.diff
>
> I ran with this change in the netperf branch for quite a long time, but
> never managed to trigger sufficient races on the allocator to result in
> the counters getting off by more than a couple. However, the reason I
> updated the patch and put it on the netperf page was that Bill Paul
> reported seeing fairly hefty stats errors on an SMP box at gig-e rates,
> and when he tried the patch it went away. It would be useful if you could
> try the patch to make sure that we're looking at a real mbuf leak and not
> an mbuf stat leak.
Aha!
That seems to be it (a stats leak). This is kind of a shame, since
the last thing a P4 needs is more atomic ops :-(
I think there may have been a real leak in the past; at least I ran
a box out of mbufs a week ago. It only came back when I ifconfig'ed
down my driver, freeing a bunch of mbufs. But this was before green's
recent mbuf leak fix, and in the middle of driver development. So who
knows..
Drew
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list