atapicam(4) as KLD?

[Lukas Ertl]

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Michael Nottebrock wrote:

> Easy workaround: Put atapicam into GENERIC. I'm waiting for that to happen
> ever since atapicam entered the tree.

How hard would it be to offer multiple different GENERIC kernels at the 
install stage, and the user can decide which one to install?  One with 
atapicam, one without... (this is not limited to atapicam, of course).

cheers,
le

-- 
Lukas Ertl                         http://homepage.univie.ac.at/l.ertl/
le at FreeBSD.org                     http://people.freebsd.org/~le/