Your CVS fix 1.109 to union_vnops.c
danfe at nsu.ru
Mon Oct 4 05:40:51 PDT 2004
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 11:06:42PM +0200, Uwe Doering wrote:
> As to your concern, in CURRENT this might be fixed already. There, the
> unionfs vnode doesn't have an object attached. Instead, calls to
> VOP_GETVOBJECT() get forwarded to the underlying file, so the same
> object gets referred as for direct modifications of that file. That
> should rule out any coherency problems, IMHO.
> Unfortunately, AFAIK, this fix has never been MFC'ed to 4-STABLE. The
> respective CVS commits are union_subr.c (rev. 1.51) and union_vnops.c
> (rev. 1.82).
Any chances they will get merged before 4.11-RELEASE?
More information about the freebsd-current