5.3-RELEASE: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt timout - what does
it mean?
Søren Schmidt
sos at DeepCore.dk
Wed Nov 10 01:41:32 PST 2004
Robert Watson wrote:
>>It means that the disk has processed the write request (interrupt seen),
>>but that the system (the bio_taskqueue) hasn't been able to get the
>>result returned to the kernel.
>>
>>Your disk is not involved in this problem since it has done its part,
>>but the rest of the system is either busy with something else, or there
>>are bugs lurking that prohibits the bio_taskqueue from running.
>>
>>Either way its a WARNING not a FAILURE :)
>
>
> I'm still a bit skeptical that the task queue is at fault -- I run my
> notebook with continuous measurement of the latency to schedule tasks,
> generating a warning for any latency > .5 seconds, and the only time I
> ever see that sort of latency is during the boot process when ACPI has
> scheduled a task to run, but the task queue thread has not yet been
> allowed to run:
Right, the timeout is 5 secs. I havn't looked into how the taskqueues
are handled recently, but in case of ATA read/writes it is the
bio_taskqueue handled by geom thats in use not the catchall ones, does
your timing cover that as well?
There are several explanations for what happens:
1. the bio_taskqueue is not pushing requests through.
2. the disks takes long to respond and uses almost all of the 5 secs
3. timeouts are not working and fireing at random.
I cannot reproduce the symptoms on any of my HW no matter how hard I hit
it, and I dont really belive in items 2 and 3 above, however I've been
proven wrong before :)
--
-Søren
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list