IRQ-Routing for 5.3-BETA
Nate Lawson
nate at root.org
Mon Nov 8 21:32:54 PST 2004
Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
> On Saturday 25 September 2004 19:43, Nate Lawson wrote:
>
>>Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
>>When the BIOS gives an initial irq, we always try to route to that
>>one first since some devices don't work at any other irq.
>
>
> I marked the appropriate IRQ in the BIOS as "ISA/nonPnP", so the marked
> IRQ *should* be assigned for the ISA card by the BIOS (but obviously
> isn't).
>
> I hope I could clear the situation a bit.
>
> I sure can switch to 6-CURRENT or at least try the new acpi_pci_link.c,
> but I don't believe that the problem is IRQ 9....
>
> Thank you very much for your interest. I fear, these old ISA cards are
> no longer of public interest... :-)
I MFC'd the change to RELENG_5 as well so if you can test there or on
6-current, you should fine that the card works as before. The change
was to allow the SCI (irq 9 on PIC systems) to always be used for
devices, even if the ACPI _PRS setting for the device doesn't explicitly
allow it.
-Nate
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list