SCHED_BSD vs SCHED_ULE ...

[Kris Kennaway]

On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 08:41:53PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 
> Is there a circumstance where the older SCHED is better then ULE?
> 
> Or is the older one something that will eventually just be removed 
> altogether?
> 
> If the older does have areas in which it is the better, are there any docs 
> comparing the two?

ULE has some bugs still, and the maintainer has been busy with
!FreeBSD for a while now.

Specifically, ULE doesn't work well on HTT (poor performance, and the
sysctls to disable HTT don't work), and I have interactivity problems
with it on my amd64 desktop.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040529/9436619c/attachment.bin