Disk performance under CURRENT

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Fri May 21 18:34:00 PDT 2004


On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 03:47:29PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I just ran test of disk writing performance under V4 (STABLE) and V5
> (CURRENT) and was surprised at the difference.
> 
> The test was simple and not at all rigorous. Just a dd bs=256k
> if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad2. This is about the simplest way of dealing with
> a disk. No file system or anything else. Just raw data to the device.
> 
> Under STABLE, I get an average of 25 MB/sec to the disk. Under CURRENT,
> it drops to 15 MB/sec. I did this because I had noted that it was now
> taking over an hour to backup my system disk (40 GB) when it was only
> taking 40 minutes when I was running V4.6. The STABLE system was built
> yesterday. The CURRENT system last Sunday.
> 
> Any idea why this is so much slower? It looks to me like it must be in
> either geom or the disk driver.

Yes, disk performance sucks on 5.x..this is something phk is planning
to work on.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040521/2811ec66/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list