mbuf.h rev 1.142

[Gleb Smirnoff]

  Dear sirs,

  what was the reason for moving ip_claim_next_hop() from ip_var.h
to mbuf.h? As far as I understand mbuf.h contains declarations to
mbuf interface, which is lower than IP protocol, or sockets.

m_claim_next_hop() is not really a pure mbuf function, while all other
functions in mbuf.h are.

After rev 1.142 including mbuf.h requires including of netinet/in.h,
and this is not logically correct.

Can you show me reason for this mixing of interface layers?

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE