Sio & Puc memory mapped

[Roman Kurakin]

Bruce Evans пишет:

>On Fri, 14 May 2004, Roman Kurakin wrote:
>  
>
>>May I ask you to make some tests for me?
>>
>>We have a set of tests, which we use for testings of our async
>>adapters. I add support for one of ours cards via puc(4)&uart(4)
>>drivers. These tests works fine with patches for sio(4) driver (was
>>tested with 5.2 sio), but fails with puc(4)&uart(4).
>>
>>I don't have any other cards supported by uart(4), so I can't test
>>it by my self. If you have a time and ability, I'll send these tests
>>for you.
>>    
>>
>Why not just use sio?  It has been tested for hundreds if not thousands
>of programmer hours in various versions over the last 16 years.  uart
>fails even simple tests, and has low performance.
>
I second. Sio works just fine with mem-maped cards after small patch.

rik

>
>Bruce
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
>
>  
>