spin lock sleepq chain held by 0xc0fc3540 for > 5 seconds

[Ian FREISLICH]

Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> That might not be enough information to go on.  Prefereably when something 
> like this happens, and a core dump is not going to happen, "show locks",
> "ps", and "tr" of interesting processes, from DDB, would be the most useful 
> things to have.

The debugger is not available because the system is wedged solid
so these usefull data are unobtainable :(

Ian

--
Ian Freislich