4.7 vs 5.2.1 SMP/UP bridging performance
Robert Watson
rwatson at FreeBSD.org
Thu May 6 19:56:05 PDT 2004
On Thu, 6 May 2004, John Baldwin wrote:
> > According to http://www.sandpile.org/ia32/coherent.htm,
> > both mfence and lfence require SSE2, so sfence has the broadest
> > coverage.
> >
> > But since only P4 needs it, and since lfence is ~25% cheaper, maybe
> > there should be a separate config option for it, and it should be a
> > straight conditional compile option for those of us cursed w/P4s.
>
> That could work I guess. Just can't stick it in GENERIC.
>
> options INTEL_MADE_MY_PIV_A_TORTOISE
>
> or some such. :)
On occasion, I've had conversations with Peter Wemm about providing HAL
modules with optimized versions of various common routines for specific
hardware platforms. However, that would require us to make a trade-off
between the performance benefits of inlining and the performance benefits
of a HAL module...
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert at fledge.watson.org Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list