system lockup - ata spurious interrupts - somehow updated
    Alexander Leidinger 
    Alexander at Leidinger.net
       
    Sun Mar 21 05:02:39 PST 2004
    
    
  
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 12:33:19 +0100
Søren Schmidt <sos at DeepCore.dk> wrote:
> Now, the above is more likely an interrupt setup/routing problem of 
> sorts, if you get spurious interrupts *something* is yanking the 
> interrupt line, but ATA knows that it hasn't requested anything and 
> spits out the "spurious" warning.
Does this also explain why I get a freezed system at boot time after
alot of those warnings when I enable HT (-current as of yesterday)?
> That said, the ICH5 support is written "blindfolded" as I do not have 
> any such HW here in the lab. So if there is a problem with ATA on those, 
> someone with the HW and enough kernel clue should look into it (or 
> someone could land the needed HW in my lab, which could also bring 
> support for the SW RAID on intel's)...
I have the hardware and I'm willing to fix this problem. What kernel
clue are we talking about?
Bye,
Alexander.
-- 
           I will be available to get hired in April 2004.
http://www.Leidinger.net                       Alexander @ Leidinger.net
  GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91  3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
    
    
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list