Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat
headed for history)
dl at leo.org
Tue Jun 29 00:51:41 PDT 2004
Paul Seniura wrote on Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:25:27PM -0500:
> Excuse my butting-in, but TSM is quite important for us, too.
> FWIW, our support contract with IBM does cover TSM clients,
> but IBM won't consider a FreeBSD-native client despite
> their supporting their MacOSX client very well & officially.
> IBM says they need more "user base" to even consider a BSD
> flavor... go figure...
I once polled users to get feedback about the demand for
a BSD client. Although I thought I got impressive numbers,
the "offer" we received was a joke (they would have charged
125,000 EUR for the port of a 5.x client, support for this
client would have cost another 25000 EUR and there would
have been no updates to future versions).
However, if you would like to make another attempt, I can
send you the E-Mail responses I have collected so far, to show
them, that there is some demand.
IRCnet: Mr-Spock - Der Zweite Platz ist Dreck -
Daniel Lang * dl at leo.org * +49 89 289 18532 * http://www.leo.org/~dl/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 5495 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040629/57751a47/smime.bin
More information about the freebsd-current