HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history

Michael Nottebrock michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Sat Jun 26 06:36:40 PDT 2004


On Saturday 26 June 2004 12:59, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:36:25 +0300
> Alex Keahan <alex at hightemplar.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Is Solaris/x86 supported by ibcs2 or svr4?   Solaris/x86 is being
> > actively developed by Sun and is far from extinct.
>
> Solaris/x86 is a niche product.
> [...]

That's all very subjective arguments. The question is, does the binary compat 
_work_ for any recent Solaris/x86 stuff? I rather doubt it, but haven't 
checked, Scott seems to suggest it doesn't.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040626/91840dd1/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list