How much of a risk is 5.x ... ?
kirk at strauser.com
Sat Jun 12 15:27:03 GMT 2004
At 2004-06-11T18:34:47Z, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy at hub.org> writes:
> I'm just about to order in a new server, and with the 5-STABLE branch
> being, more or less, just around the corner, was considering using this
> new server to start migrating to 5.x ...
I've been running 5.x on a production server for quite a few months now.
The main reason is that I'm the main Unix guy at my job, and if I get hit by
a bus it'll be far easier for my coworkers to upgrade from 5.2.something to
5-STABLE when it comes out than from 4-STABLE to 5-STABLE.
I've had no problems whatsoever in a live environment.
"94 outdated ports on the box,
94 outdated ports.
Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done,
82 outdated ports on the box."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040612/b67615b0/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-current