NEW TAR
Bill Vermillion
bv at wjv.com
Thu Jul 29 11:41:49 PDT 2004
In freebsd-current Digest, Vol 70, Issue 13
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:59:20 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Barry Bouwsma
> <freebsd-misuser at remove-NOSPAM-to-reply.NOSPAM.dyndns.dk>
> Subject: Re: NEW TAR
> To: Tim Kientzle <kientzle at freebsd.org>
> Cc: stable at freebsd.org
> Message-ID: <200407291159.i6TBxKj01347 at Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK>
> [introduced to freebsd-stable@ , don't bother replying directly to me]
> On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:37:28 -0700, Tim Kientzle proclaimed:
>
> > By default, /usr/bin/tar is now a symlink pointing
> > to /usr/bin/bsdtar.
> [in -current]
>
> [...]
>
> > * Portability: gtar is portable to many different Unix and non-Unix
> > systems. bsdtar supports standard file formats that are widely
> > supported by other implementations. There are efforts to port
> > bsdtar to other platforms.
> Would it be possible to include patches similar to (or based
> upon) the following diffs, in order to get `bsdtar' to compile
> cleanly under my (older) 4.x -- based on checking out HEAD of
> libarchive and bsdtar from the CVS repository? (I haven't looked
> for source otherwise, sorry; this is to make an future MFC more
> compatible with older 4.x)
The bsdtar in /usr/ports on my 4.10 compiles with nothing
more than typing 'make'.
Are your ports up to date, or is there something I'm missing here?
> End of freebsd-current Digest, Vol 70, Issue 13
> ***********************************************
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list