HEADS UP: change in ports rc.d script behaviour

[Remko Lodder]

Joel Dahl wrote:

> On Sat, 2004-07-24 at 19:53, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> 
>>On Saturday 24 July 2004 17:09, Mike Makonnen wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I know this commit breaks the print/cups port and eik@ has said that the
>>>following ports are also broken:
>>
>>Has this been approved by RE/portmgr?
> 
> 
>>From the commit message:
> 	"Discussed with: portmgr"
> 
> I don't know if this means "approved" though...
> 

Okay, i am in no way an portmgr or something similiar,
but i feel this is getting a long discussion. Perhaps it is smart to 
backout the change, and let Mike and the portmaintainers generate some 
patches to make sure the ports still work (especially apache which is 
frequently used imho). After that the portmgr's can announce this 
change. Do not get me wrong, i think that it is a good idea, but perhaps 
not at this point in time.

Summary: Backout change and provide updates to the ports, discuss with 
portmgr and let portmgr announce it...

my $0.02

-- 
Kind regards,

Remko Lodder                   |remko at elvandar.org
Reporter DSINet                |remko at dsinet.org
Projectleader Mostly-Harmless  |remko at mostly-harmless.nl