HEADSUP: X.Org conversion
Eric Anholt
eta at lclark.edu
Fri Jul 23 17:33:20 PDT 2004
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 17:25, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> On 24-Jul-2004 Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 17:07, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> >>
> >> Just one question: have the inconsistencies been worked out in
> >> translating XFree86 fonts package dependencies to Xorg fonts
> >> packages? Have all ports that depend on XFree86 fonts packages
> >> been adjusted, and if so, how was this issue resolved?
> >
> > Yes, it was dealt with by making those ports point at the font
> > package that provides truetype fonts.
>
> OK, but then what about the dependencies on Type1 fonts? Those have
> all just been dropped? Might it not be better to ensure that both
> packages are listed now as dependencies?
Do those package actually depend on type1 fonts? If so, then they
should be fixed to depend on them.
I didn't investigate deeply. I'm pretty sure they just want a pretty
scalable font.
--
Eric Anholt eta at lclark.edu
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt at FreeBSD.org
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list