HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat removed, linux to follow

[Matthew Seaman]

On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 09:23:09PM +0100, n0g0013 wrote:

> what is the story with PGP signatures these days?  last i
> investigated there was a multi-part mime format that was meant
> to be standard and nobody used (except mutt, which i use).
> 
> does anyone use that format or is it all inline now?  mutt
> won't recognise the inline format as signed (and consequently
> won't verify the content).

It's a case of duelling standards: RFC 2633 vs RFC 3156.  You should
be able to verify RFC 2633 messages using openssl's smime capability.

	Cheers,

	Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                       26 The Paddocks
                                                      Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey         Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614                                  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040704/982efdd9/attachment.bin