Query on status of cross-builds

[Ruslan Ermilov]

On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 01:12:00PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:44:43PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:20:01AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > > - ia64: internal errors in ld(1)
> > > 
> > > Way, way at the bottom of my task list.
> > > Others are certainly free to look into this.
> > > 
> > Marcel sent you a patch that fixes BFD configuration for ia64
> > on 32-bit machines.
> > 
> > > > - sparc64: generates bad assembler in gnu/usr.bin/tar
> > > 
> > > See ia64 responce above.
> > > 
> > sparc64 will probably need the same patch.
> 
> No. It's a compiler bug on sparc64. I think the old binutils just
> didn't complain about the invalid instruction. I compared the
> output of the native cc and the cross cc and they are different.
> Not much, but fataly so.
> 
Yes, I produced that diff as well (by using -save-temps).
Unfortunately, I don't know sparc64 assembler at all...

But why it worked before BU upgrade?  (We didn't have
these tinderbox failures.)

Does GCC use some of the BU bits internally?


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040703/1a82fe10/attachment.bin