Status reports - why not regularly?
krion at FreeBSD.org
Tue Jan 13 10:32:53 PST 2004
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:28:27PM -0500, Jonathan T. Sage wrote:
> Exactally, and as Mark pointed out, I think that keeping in changes to
> the ports infrastructure (bsd.ports.mk) would be an excellent idea.
Yes, I think portmgr@ should mail to ports@ and explain the
most important updates to bsd.*.mk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040113/806ea3e2/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-current