Status reports - why not regularly?

Kirill Ponomarew krion at
Tue Jan 13 10:32:53 PST 2004


On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:28:27PM -0500, Jonathan T. Sage wrote:
> Exactally, and as Mark pointed out, I think that keeping in changes to 
> the ports infrastructure ( would be an excellent idea.

Yes, I think portmgr@ should mail to ports@ and explain the
most important updates to bsd.*.mk

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list