Future of RAIDFrame
    David Gilbert 
    dgilbert at dclg.ca
       
    Sun Jan 11 10:20:58 PST 2004
    
    
  
>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Long <scottl at freebsd.org> writes:
Scott> Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>> Scott Long <scottl at freebsd.org> writes:
>> 
>>> I started RAIDframe three years ago with the hope of bringing a
>>> proven and extensible RAID stack to FreeBSD.
>> 
>> 
>> I'm having trouble seeing what RF does that Vinum (or at least a
>> properly GEOMified Vinum) can't do...
>> 
>> DES
Scott> Please read the RAIDframe documents at
Scott> http://www.pdl.cmu.edu/RAIDframe before you ask again.
Having used Vinum is production and on home boxes for some time, and
having come in contact with Raidframe on NetBSD several times, I would
distill this to several points.
- Vinum is fairly fragile and a number of operations have vastly
   non-obvious steps.
- Vinum's support for different types of RAID is limited.
- Vinum's abstractions don't work for more complex cases.
That said, we need a strong and robust software raid.
Dave.
-- 
============================================================================
|David Gilbert, Independent Contractor.       | Two things can only be     |
|Mail:       dave at daveg.ca                    |  equal if and only if they |
|http://daveg.ca                              |   are precisely opposite.  |
=========================================================GLO================
    
    
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list