Future of RAIDFrame

Scott Long scottl at freebsd.org
Sat Jan 10 17:14:16 PST 2004

Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:12:57 +0100
> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>>As much as I would hate to see RF and Vinum disappar from our
>>source tree, maybe what we need to do is to kick them both into
>>"training-camp" in p4 while you and Greg look the other way.
> [...]
>>I'd say lets kick them both into perforce and let whoever wants
>>their hands have a go at them.
> RF isn't working today on -current, vinum is (please don't tell me
> something else, I don't want the system under my desk stop running on a
> vinum volume just because you say it has to :-)). Do you really want to
> throw your axe at vinum while it's still alive?
> Bye,
> Alexander.

Ok, stop right here.  This is the third email so for that is attempting
the debate the merits of one over the other.  Spending time arguing that
point is a waste of time.  If working on RF is something that interests
you, then show your support and say so.


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list