Future of RAIDFrame
scottl at freebsd.org
Sat Jan 10 17:14:16 PST 2004
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:12:57 +0100
> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>>As much as I would hate to see RF and Vinum disappar from our
>>source tree, maybe what we need to do is to kick them both into
>>"training-camp" in p4 while you and Greg look the other way.
>>I'd say lets kick them both into perforce and let whoever wants
>>their hands have a go at them.
> RF isn't working today on -current, vinum is (please don't tell me
> something else, I don't want the system under my desk stop running on a
> vinum volume just because you say it has to :-)). Do you really want to
> throw your axe at vinum while it's still alive?
Ok, stop right here. This is the third email so for that is attempting
the debate the merits of one over the other. Spending time arguing that
point is a waste of time. If working on RF is something that interests
you, then show your support and say so.
More information about the freebsd-current