-fno-strict-aliasing
Roop Nanuwa
roop at hqst.com
Mon Feb 9 23:08:06 PST 2004
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:11:58AM -0500, Richard Coleman wrote:
>
>
>>Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:28:20AM -0200, Bruno T. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi everyone.
>>>>i'm pretty new to bsd, but i have some background in linux development
>>>>and for what i have seen until now, i must say that -CURRENT is rather
>>>>impressive, congrats !
>>>>
>>>>I was rebuilding my base sys and noticed that any compiler flag
>>>>that implies -fstrict-aliasing (like -O2) would break some few things,
>>>>adding "-fno-strict-aliasing" to "CFLAGS+=" in these makefiles
>>>>solves the problem for now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Don't do that then :-)
>>>
>>>Kris
>>>
>>>
>>Although it's not urgent, I don't see why the aliasing problems can't be
>>fixed. I think it would be more honest if the party line was "FreeBSD
>>has bugs, so we can't use -O2 right now" rather than the standard reply
>>of "-O2 is not supported, don't even try".
>>
>>
>
>It's "don't even try unless you plan to fix them".
>
>Kris
>
>
I did a buildworld earlier today with -O2 on and had to modify about 4
makefiles to
get it to compile. That's not too bad. I already submitted a patch to
fix one (libexec/ypxfr) of them.
Working on a second one (libc/isinf) now. Both of these are relatively
trivial. On the other hand,
one of the last two left is in libpam and I don't think I can even begin
to fix that, though. Hopefully
someone more familiar with it will be able to take a crack at it sooner
or later.
--roop
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list