panic: lock (sleep mutex) inp not locked @
kuriyama at imgsrc.co.jp
Tue Aug 17 21:18:45 PDT 2004
At Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:02:44 -0400 (EDT),
Robert Watson wrote:
> Hmm. This code is somewhat more spaghetti than I thought. In the IPv4
> version, we check the return value of the notify function to decide if we
> need to unlock. Something like the following may fix this:
Okay, I'll try with your patch.
> Do you have a dump for this? If so, is there any chance you could tell me
> what function 'notify' was set to point to, and what the value of 'inp' is
Sorry, I didn't take a dump at this time. I'll take it when I get a
panic next time.
> in6_pcbnotify(c0709d40,e4d3abb0,1600,e4d3abd0,9bed) at in6_pcbnotify+0x26d
Is "9bed" is the value of notify argument? It seems it is too small
for function pointer...
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama at imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc.
<kuriyama at FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project
More information about the freebsd-current