Public Access to Perforce?
brooks at one-eyed-alien.net
Tue Aug 17 09:21:30 PDT 2004
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 08:55:51PM +0800, csj wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce M Simpson" <bms at spc.org>
> Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.current
> Cc: <current at freebsd.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 2:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Public Access to Perforce?
> >On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:04:03AM -0400, Chris BeHanna wrote:
> >> Is there a read-only account that the general public could use?
> >I think this is an excellent idea. Perhaps one should be set up.
> Perforce license not only limits the user number but also the client
> number. I don't think a read-only account will work.
If we ever switch to Perforce as our development repository, the primary
source access mechanism will remain CVS as we will maintain a fully CVS
repository that looks just like our current one (with possiable
exception of some early, ill advised, temporary branches).
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040817/ffabf82a/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-current