Is anything being done re: the pcm timeout issue?

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Thursday 12 August 2004 01:56, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> On 11-Aug-2004 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> > I do appreciate your looking into this matter.  So far, with my
> > latest kernel, I haven't experienced the problem yet, either.  Which
> > doesn't necessarily mean, of course, that I still won't.  :-)
>
> Oh well, it was nice while it lasted.  <sigh>  Just did it again.
>
> I think tomorrow I'm going to try pulling the es1371 card out of my old
> machine and see how it works in the amd64 box.  Maybe it's just the
> chipset/driver. <crossing fingers>

I'd not rule it out, considering what I had to do to get my onboard snd_ich 
(different variant though probably, it's onboard a P4 mobo) "working" under 
Linux... (with binary volume control (mute - max), no mixers besides master 
and defaulting to mute) it seems the matrix of possible chipset variants with 
this particular ac97-thing is simply too big for a unified driver approach. 
FWIW, my snd_ich works fine on -CURRENT, but i386 of course.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040812/fc1f2bf1/attachment.bin