upgrade of file(1) to 4.10 (including FreeBSD elf(5) fixes)

David O'Brien obrien at freebsd.org
Mon Aug 9 02:09:11 PDT 2004

On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 08:31:15PM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> As usual, file(1) has to follow. Anyway, since it works for now, and 
> currently there is no reason to break it, why is it bad? I actually like 
> that feature, and it is useful for debugging ports that should have been 
> recompiled after a system upgrade.

Sounds like you're trying to work around bugs in the Ports Collection,
please go fix those bugs and use the proper tool for the job.

-- David  (obrien at FreeBSD.org)

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list