altq in main tree?

[Max Laier]

On Thursday 22 April 2004 12:04, jeremie le-hen wrote:
> > > I just wonder if there are any chances that altq will be in the main
> > > tree in the near future?
> >
> > I work on altq integration on and off for a couple of weeks, yet the
> > outcome is unclear as the required locking for altq is not exactly easy
> > to do. But as vital locking is a must-do item for any new subsystem these
> > days, we will have to see how it works out.
>
> I must havemissed something. I though that ALTQ was already in the tree
> since it is supposed to be fully integrated in pf.

Yes it is fully integrated into pf, but as ALTQ is not present in FreeBSD 
(yet) pf is build w/o this support. Just like it would be the case in OpenBSD 
when one builds a kernel w/o "options ALTQ".

-- 
Best regards,				| mlaier at freebsd.org
Max Laier				| ICQ #67774661
http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/	| mlaier at EFnet
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040422/32cd620f/attachment.bin