altq in main tree?

Max Laier max at
Thu Apr 22 18:31:53 PDT 2004

On Thursday 22 April 2004 12:04, jeremie le-hen wrote:
> > > I just wonder if there are any chances that altq will be in the main
> > > tree in the near future?
> >
> > I work on altq integration on and off for a couple of weeks, yet the
> > outcome is unclear as the required locking for altq is not exactly easy
> > to do. But as vital locking is a must-do item for any new subsystem these
> > days, we will have to see how it works out.
> I must havemissed something. I though that ALTQ was already in the tree
> since it is supposed to be fully integrated in pf.

Yes it is fully integrated into pf, but as ALTQ is not present in FreeBSD 
(yet) pf is build w/o this support. Just like it would be the case in OpenBSD 
when one builds a kernel w/o "options ALTQ".

Best regards,				| mlaier at
Max Laier				| ICQ #67774661	| mlaier at EFnet
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url :

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list