SMBFS problems in this morning's -CURRENT

[leafy]

On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:36:35AM -0500, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote:
> I had to do the same thing this time, but I assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that 
> it had something to do with trying to use the previous, incorrect version of 
> mount_smbfs.
> 
> - -- 
> Jonathan Fosburgh
The new binary requires this, the old one did not. The commit message 
says that mount(2) will auto-load the smbfs kernel module, but I am 
afraid it's not the case.

Jiawei
-- 
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
               --inspired by The Tao of Programming